Legal Desk, New Delhi, 12-May: On Wednesday, the Supreme Court declared that digital access is a fundamental right and issued several directives to make the Know-Your-Customer (KYC) procedure easier for people who may have low eyesight or visual impairment, including survivors of acid attacks who may have sustained eye injuries.
The court made the statement after a panel of justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan rendered a decision on two PILs related to these issues.
According to the court’s historic ruling, the government must guarantee that digital procedures like KYC are widely accessible to everyone, including those with impairments or those who may have suffered facial disfigurements. According to the court, this is protected by Articles 21 (right to life and liberty), 14 (right to equality), and 15 (protection against discrimination) of the Indian Constitution.
Crucially, the court ruled that, in accordance with Article 21, the right to internet access is an essential part of the right to life. The court gave a number of instructions along with the order to guarantee that those with visual impairments or other similar difficulties could finish the KYC procedure.
We have maintained that the KYC procedures for the disabled must be changed. We have provided twenty instructions. The court noted that the petitioners’ facial disfigurements from acid attacks and blindness have prevented them from completing the KYC process.
The petitioners have a statutory right to be accommodated during the KYC procedure thanks to constitutional laws. The accessibility code must be incorporated into the updated digital KYC criteria. “Article 21 needs to be reinterpreted in light of such technology and the growing digital divide in the modern era, where economic opportunities, etc., are through digital (access),” it continued.
One of the petitioners was a victim of an acid attack who suffered severe facial and eye damage. In July 2023, the survivor went to an ICICI Bank to create a bank account. However, because the bank insisted on her taking a “live photograph” by blinking her eyes, it was determined that she was unable to complete the Digital KYC/e-KYC process.
According to the petition, a customer must blink their eyes in front of the camera in order to satisfy the RBI-regulated KYC process’s mandatory condition of demonstrating their “liveness.”
Only after the issue caused a social media controversy did the bank later make an exception for the petitioner.
Additionally, the petitioner stated that all public and private institutions that use the Digital KYC/e-KYC procedure should receive a directive to properly apply any recommendations that may be provided.
Useful Links
- To get latest updates visit our YouTube Channel: The Legal Observer
In House Development | The Legal Observer
-
The Hidden Cost of NEET: Who Really Loses?
With the President rejecting Tamil Naduโs NEET exemption bill, the debate on educational fairness, state autonomy, and meritocracy has resurfaced. News Desk, New Delhi, 12 May: A Blow to Federal Harmony The central government, via the President, recently dismissed Tamil Naduโs legislative effort to opt out of the NEET exam. This decisionโdespite the bill being…
-
Calcutta HC on Lawyers’ Strikes | The Legal Observer
Calcutta High Court urges lawyers to withdraw strikes after attacks on advocates, citing hardship to litigants and the need for court security. The Calcutta High Court has urged Bar Associations to end strikes at two subordinate courts following reported attacks on advocates, emphasising that continued disruption of judicial proceedings places ordinary litigants at a serious…
-
Calcutta HC Questions Detention | The Legal Observer
Calcutta High Court questions the two-month detention of a suspected Bangladeshi national, stressing due process before deportation. The Calcutta High Court has questioned the legal basis for keeping a Murshidabad resident in detention for nearly two months over suspected Bangladeshi nationality, emphasising that deportation must follow due process of law. Calcutta High Court Questions Prolonged…
-
Delhi Women Safety: Supreme Court Issues Directions | The Legal Observer
Delhi women safety: Supreme Court directs enhanced police patrolling, strict public transport driver verification and action against unauthorised liquor outlets. Expressing concern over recent sexual offences in Delhi-NCR, the Supreme Court has directed authorities to strengthen preventive policing and ensure that existing safety measures deliver visible results on the ground. Supreme Court Steps Up Scrutiny…
