Tuesday, September 22, 2026
होमCurrent AffairsCreditor Can Seek Possession After Sale: Calcutta HC | The Legal Observer

Creditor Can Seek Possession After Sale: Calcutta HC | The Legal Observer

Published on

Calcutta HC rules secured creditors can seek possession of property under SARFAESI Act even after sale to purchaser.


Calcutta High Court Upholds Lender’s Right to Possession Under SARFAESI

In a significant ruling on creditor rights under the SARFAESI Act, the Calcutta High Court has held that a secured creditor can seek physical possession of an immovable property under Section 14 even after the property has been sold to a purchaser.

The decision came from a division bench comprising Justices Debangsu Basak and Md. Shabbar Rashidi, which overturned a Single Judge’s order that had refused State Bank of India (SBI) the right to physical possession of the property.


Background of the Case

The matter arose when SBI, acting as a secured creditor, filed a writ petition seeking physical possession of an immovable property that had already been sold to a purchaser following default by the borrower. The Single Judge had earlier denied this request, prompting SBI to file an appeal before the division bench.


The bench clarified that Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 empowers a secured creditor to approach the District Magistrate or Chief Metropolitan Magistrate for assistance in taking possession of secured assets. This authority, the Court ruled, remains available even after the asset has been sold, provided the sale has occurred under lawful proceedings.

“The objective of Section 14 is to aid the enforcement of possession, and this function is not extinguished upon sale,” the bench observed.


Implications of the Verdict

This ruling is likely to bolster the enforcement rights of banks and financial institutions dealing with non-performing assets (NPAs). Legal experts suggest it may prevent delays in recovery by streamlining the possession process, even post-sale.

Furthermore, it provides legal clarity in cases where purchasers face resistance from borrowers or encroachers, helping ensure that possession aligns with the lawful sale of secured assets.


For video summaries of key judgments, visit our official channel: @TheLegalObserver YouTube

Latest articles

SC: Specific Performance Sale Cannot Be Undone | The Legal Observer

Supreme Court restores a 1979 specific performance decree, holding it inequitable to undo a...

Calcutta HC Orders Return of 3-Year-Old Child | The Legal Observer

Calcutta High Court directs CWC to return a 3-year-old child, holding he was neither...

SC Seeks POSH Rules for Women Lawyers | The Legal Observer

Supreme Court urges Centre and BCI to frame POSH regulations for sexual harassment complaints...

ECI Freezes TMC Name, Symbol | The Legal Observer

ECI bars rival TMC factions from using the All India Trinamool Congress name and...

More like this

SC: Specific Performance Sale Cannot Be Undone | The Legal Observer

Supreme Court restores a 1979 specific performance decree, holding it inequitable to undo a...

Calcutta HC Orders Return of 3-Year-Old Child | The Legal Observer

Calcutta High Court directs CWC to return a 3-year-old child, holding he was neither...

SC Seeks POSH Rules for Women Lawyers | The Legal Observer

Supreme Court urges Centre and BCI to frame POSH regulations for sexual harassment complaints...