With the President rejecting Tamil Nadu’s NEET exemption bill, the debate on educational fairness, state autonomy, and meritocracy has resurfaced.
News Desk, New Delhi, 12 May:
A Blow to Federal Harmony
The central government, via the President, recently dismissed Tamil Nadu’s legislative effort to opt out of the NEET exam. This decision—despite the bill being passed unanimously by the State Assembly not once but twice—reflects a deepening strain in India’s federal balance. More importantly, it reignites concerns about whether NEET has truly democratized medical education or only served to widen existing disparities.
A Syllabus Gap that Penalises State Students
NEET is structured primarily around the CBSE curriculum, leaving students from the Tamil Nadu State Board at a clear disadvantage. Before NEET’s imposition, these students dominated admissions to government medical colleges. Today, their share has fallen sharply, while CBSE students have gained ground. This shift doesn’t signal a drop in academic standards but points to the exam’s misalignment with state curricula, making it an unfair playing field.
Coaching Industry and Class Divide
NEET has inadvertently fostered a booming coaching industry, with many aspirants compelled to spend lakhs annually to stay competitive. This has placed rural, low-income, and first-generation learners at a severe disadvantage. The number of science stream students in Tamil Nadu’s government schools has declined—a quiet indicator of lost dreams. To counter this, the State introduced a 7.5% quota for government school students in medical admissions, all of which were filled in 2024, showing that ability is not the issue—access is.
Beyond Marks: What Medical Merit Truly Means
Medicine is not just about acing exams—it requires empathy, commitment, and a willingness to serve. Tamil Nadu’s earlier +2-based admission model produced thousands of grassroots doctors who contributed to its strong public health infrastructure. NEET, in contrast, tends to favour urban students who excel in test environments but may lack grassroots orientation. The result? A potential disconnect between future doctors and public health needs.
Mental Health Toll Can’t Be Ignored
In Tamil Nadu, several NEET aspirants have tragically died by suicide in recent years. These are not isolated incidents but symptoms of the immense pressure created by a single-exam system. For a State known for its inclusive education ethos, this growing mental health crisis is alarming and demands urgent reflection.
Undermining State Autonomy
The rejection of the State’s NEET exemption bills, despite unanimous political and social backing, raises serious concerns about the erosion of State rights in education policy. While education falls under the Concurrent List, States must retain the flexibility to address their unique socio-economic realities. Imposing a uniform system like NEET ignores regional diversities and undermines the principle of cooperative federalism.
The Myth of Quality Control
Proponents of NEET argue it maintains standards in medical education. However, all medical students—regardless of how they were admitted—must pass the same university exams and clinical tests. What NEET does control is who gets the opportunity in the first place. True quality lies in supporting all students to succeed, not just filtering them through a narrow definition of merit that often favours the privileged.
🔗 Useful Links
Explore more on Views and News related to Indian education and legal reforms.
🌐 YouTube Channel
Watch our analysis on YouTube
-
The Hidden Cost of NEET: Who Really Loses?
With the President rejecting Tamil Nadu’s NEET exemption bill, the debate on educational fairness, state autonomy, and meritocracy has resurfaced. News Desk, New Delhi, 12 May: A Blow to Federal Harmony The central government, via the President, recently dismissed Tamil Nadu’s legislative effort to opt out of the NEET exam. This decision—despite the bill being…
-
Supreme Court on Illegal Arrests and Re-Arrest Rights | The Legal Observer
Supreme Court rulings in Prabir Purkayastha, Pankaj Bansal, and Vihaan Kumar cases clarify that arrests without proper communication of grounds are illegal under Article 22(1). Recent Supreme Court rulings have drawn a bright constitutional line: an illegal arrest cannot be cured by a re-arrest, and liberty lost through opacity cannot be redeemed by procedural afterthought.…
-
Supreme Court Questions Centre on Tribunal Act | The Legal Observer
Supreme Court asks if Parliament can reintroduce provisions earlier struck down in the Tribunal Reforms Act 2021, raising key constitutional questions. The Supreme Court has questioned the Union Government on the constitutionality of reintroducing provisions previously struck down, while hearing challenges to the Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021. In a crucial constitutional hearing, the Supreme Court…
-
Transfer of Title Exempts from Service Tax | The Legal Observer
The Supreme Court rules that mere transfer of title in immovable property is not a “service” under the Finance Act 1994, putting such transactions outside service tax. In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court of India has held that a mere transfer of title in immovable property by way of sale does not qualify as…
