With the President rejecting Tamil Nadu’s NEET exemption bill, the debate on educational fairness, state autonomy, and meritocracy has resurfaced.
News Desk, New Delhi, 12 May:
A Blow to Federal Harmony
The central government, via the President, recently dismissed Tamil Nadu’s legislative effort to opt out of the NEET exam. This decision—despite the bill being passed unanimously by the State Assembly not once but twice—reflects a deepening strain in India’s federal balance. More importantly, it reignites concerns about whether NEET has truly democratized medical education or only served to widen existing disparities.
A Syllabus Gap that Penalises State Students
NEET is structured primarily around the CBSE curriculum, leaving students from the Tamil Nadu State Board at a clear disadvantage. Before NEET’s imposition, these students dominated admissions to government medical colleges. Today, their share has fallen sharply, while CBSE students have gained ground. This shift doesn’t signal a drop in academic standards but points to the exam’s misalignment with state curricula, making it an unfair playing field.
Coaching Industry and Class Divide
NEET has inadvertently fostered a booming coaching industry, with many aspirants compelled to spend lakhs annually to stay competitive. This has placed rural, low-income, and first-generation learners at a severe disadvantage. The number of science stream students in Tamil Nadu’s government schools has declined—a quiet indicator of lost dreams. To counter this, the State introduced a 7.5% quota for government school students in medical admissions, all of which were filled in 2024, showing that ability is not the issue—access is.
Beyond Marks: What Medical Merit Truly Means
Medicine is not just about acing exams—it requires empathy, commitment, and a willingness to serve. Tamil Nadu’s earlier +2-based admission model produced thousands of grassroots doctors who contributed to its strong public health infrastructure. NEET, in contrast, tends to favour urban students who excel in test environments but may lack grassroots orientation. The result? A potential disconnect between future doctors and public health needs.
Mental Health Toll Can’t Be Ignored
In Tamil Nadu, several NEET aspirants have tragically died by suicide in recent years. These are not isolated incidents but symptoms of the immense pressure created by a single-exam system. For a State known for its inclusive education ethos, this growing mental health crisis is alarming and demands urgent reflection.
Undermining State Autonomy
The rejection of the State’s NEET exemption bills, despite unanimous political and social backing, raises serious concerns about the erosion of State rights in education policy. While education falls under the Concurrent List, States must retain the flexibility to address their unique socio-economic realities. Imposing a uniform system like NEET ignores regional diversities and undermines the principle of cooperative federalism.
The Myth of Quality Control
Proponents of NEET argue it maintains standards in medical education. However, all medical students—regardless of how they were admitted—must pass the same university exams and clinical tests. What NEET does control is who gets the opportunity in the first place. True quality lies in supporting all students to succeed, not just filtering them through a narrow definition of merit that often favours the privileged.
🔗 Useful Links
Explore more on Views and News related to Indian education and legal reforms.
🌐 YouTube Channel
Watch our analysis on YouTube
-
The Hidden Cost of NEET: Who Really Loses?
With the President rejecting Tamil Nadu’s NEET exemption bill, the debate on educational fairness, state autonomy, and meritocracy has resurfaced. News Desk, New Delhi, 12 May: A Blow to Federal Harmony The central government, via the President, recently dismissed Tamil Nadu’s legislative effort to opt out of the NEET exam. This decision—despite the bill being…
-
Accused Can’t Be Forced to Produce Evidence Under S.91 | The Legal Observer
Calcutta High Court rules Section 91 CrPC can’t be used to compel accused to produce self-incriminating material. Major protection reinforced.Reinforcing constitutional protections, the Calcutta High Court has ruled that courts cannot invoke Section 91 CrPC to compel an accused to submit incriminating documents against themselves. Calcutta HC Clarifies Scope of Section 91 CrPC: No Compulsion…
-
SC Imposes ₹2 Lakh Cost on IT Dept Over Tax Evasion Case | The Legal Observer
Supreme Court criticises Income Tax Department for starting prosecution without ITAT ruling; imposes ₹2 lakh penalty for misuse of authority. The apex court condemned the Income Tax Department for initiating prosecution for willful tax evasion without waiting for the ITAT ruling, calling it a misuse of power. Supreme Court Criticises Income Tax Department for Misusing…
-
SC Probes Detention of Bengali Migrants Over Language | The Legal Observer
The Supreme Court asks the Union if Bengali-speaking migrant workers were detained as foreigners merely due to their language use.A PIL challenging the detention of Muslim migrants from West Bengal has prompted the Supreme Court to seek a detailed response from the Union government on allegations of discriminatory detention based solely on language. Supreme Court…
