Matter of unaccounted, misappropriation and illegal transfer of properties worth crores of Waqf Board to builders
The Supreme Court will hear on February 16 the matter of unaccounted, misappropriation and illegal transfer of properties worth crores of Waqf Board to builders.
Petitioners and advocates Rauf Rahim and Ali Asghar Rahim have given some startling statistics about Waqf properties and how they Pointed out the astonishing value of the properties that states have failed to enumerate these properties.
According to the petitioner, the value of Shia Waqf properties in the state of West Bengal is approximately Rs 5,424 crore, while the value of Sunni Waqf properties in the same state is Rs 13,126 crore.
Similarly in Karnataka, Shia Waqf Board’s assets are around 688 crores, while Sunni Waqf Board’s are around Rs 99,311 crores.
Petitions filed by rival factions Uddhav Thackeray and Chief Minister Eknath Shinde in connection with the Maharashtra political crisis
A constitution bench will continue on February 16 hearing petitions filed by rival factions Uddhav Thackeray and Chief Minister Eknath Shinde in connection with the Maharashtra political crisis.
The Constitution Bench questioned the 2016 Arunachal Pradesh verdict.
The court said that some changes are needed in the decision of Nabam Rebia.
The Supreme Court said that the question is whether the decision can be changed by a bench of five judges or should it be sent to a larger bench.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, counsel for the Governor of Maharashtra, said that the right to end the session of the House rests with the Governor and not the Speaker.
Also Read: Law Minister kiren Rijiju gets unexpected support on Collegium issue from Congress MP
Petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Section 6-A of the Citizenship Act relating to illegal immigrants from Assam
A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court will hear on February 16 the petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Section 6-A of the Citizenship Act relating to illegal immigrants from Assam.
The Supreme Court has been hearing a case challenging Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, which was added by an amendment in 1985 in furtherance of the Assam Accord.
The Assam Accord was a memorandum of understanding signed between the representatives of India and the leaders of the Assam Movement.
It was signed on 15 August 1985 in New Delhi in the presence of the then Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi.
Bail plea filed by District Panchayat member Sunil Nishad, a resident of Gauribazar police station area of Deoria district
The Supreme Court will hear on February 16 the bail plea filed by District Panchayat member Sunil Nishad, a resident of Gauribazar police station area of Deoria district.
The victim’s father, a resident of Gauribazar police station area, had told the police in Tahrir that he had a tea-samosa shop.
Where his daughter also used to come to help her father. Sunil Nishad, District President of BJP Fisherman Cell and District Panchayat member, used to come to drink tea.
The relatives told that during this time he got acquainted with Sunil Nishad.
Also Read: Delhi Lt Governor Orders Halt to DDA Mehrauli Demolition Drive
Petition filed against the demolition of 3000 houses in Delhi’s Mehrauli
The Delhi High Court will hear on February 16 a petition filed against the demolition of 3000 houses in Delhi’s Mehrauli.
The demolition action of the DDA in Mehrauli was strongly opposed by the local people.
Earlier, DDA gave notice to vacate the land. This action was being taken for not vacating the land even after the notice.
Bail applications of accused Vijay Nair, Binoy Babu, Sharad Chandra Reddy, Sameer Mahendru and Abhishek Boinpally in the Excise Policy case
The Rouse Avenue Court will pronounce its verdict on February 16 on the bail applications of accused Vijay Nair, Binoy Babu, Sharad Chandra Reddy, Sameer Mahendru and Abhishek Boinpally in the Excise Policy case.
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) had on January 6 filed a supplementary charge sheet in the money laundering case related to the alleged excise policy scam.
He did not make Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia as an accused even in this charge sheet, while he is named in the FIR. The ED had said that the investigation in this matter is still going on.
