Thursday, November 13, 2025
होमCurrent AffairsSpecial Court Rejects Plea to Cancel Rahul Gandhi's Bail in Savarkar Defamation...

Special Court Rejects Plea to Cancel Rahul Gandhi’s Bail in Savarkar Defamation Case

Published on

Defamation Case Against Rahul Gandhi
Defamation Case Against Rahul Gandhi

Court says no evidence Gandhi delayed trial; Savarkar’s grandson had sought strict action

A Special MP/MLA Court in Mumbai has dismissed an application that sought strict action against Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, including the cancellation of his bail, in the ongoing Savarkar defamation case.

The plea was filed by Satyaki Savarkar, the grandson of Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, claiming that Gandhi was deliberately delaying the trial. However, the court ruled there was no sufficient ground to support this allegation.

What the Court Said

In his May 28 order, Special Judge Amol Shinde stated:

“There are no sufficient reasons to seize the bail bonds of the accused. It is not found that the accused is prolonging the matter.”

Background of the Case

The defamation case was filed over Rahul Gandhi’s statements allegedly defaming Vinayak Savarkar, a right-wing nationalist figure. The complaint highlights a speech Gandhi gave in London on March 5, 2023, during which he allegedly made false claims about Savarkar.

Satyaki Savarkar, through his lawyer Sangram Kolhatkar, argued that Gandhi knowingly made false and malicious statements about Savarkar, including a claim that Savarkar wrote about assaulting a Muslim man—a statement the complainant says is completely untrue.

The complaint says these remarks hurt the reputation of Savarkar and caused mental agony to his family. Though the speech was made in the UK, it was published across India, especially in Pune, prompting the complaint.

  • Punishment under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code (defamation)
  • Compensation under Section 357 of the CrPC
  • Allegation that Gandhi intended to harm Savarkar’s image for political gain

Earlier, the court had allowed Rahul Gandhi’s request to convert the case from a summary trial to a summons trial, so that historical records could be presented as evidence.

📌 Also Read: Defamation Cases in Indian Politics
📺 Watch updates on: The Legal Observer YouTube Channel

Latest articles

Supreme Court on Illegal Arrests and Re-Arrest Rights | The Legal Observer

Supreme Court rulings in Prabir Purkayastha, Pankaj Bansal, and Vihaan Kumar cases clarify that...

Supreme Court Questions Centre on Tribunal Act | The Legal Observer

Supreme Court asks if Parliament can reintroduce provisions earlier struck down in the Tribunal...

Transfer of Title Exempts from Service Tax | The Legal Observer

The Supreme Court rules that mere transfer of title in immovable property is not...

BNSS Post-Acquittal Remedies: Key Distinctions Explained | The Legal Observer

BNSS 2023 reshapes criminal procedure in India. Here’s how post-acquittal remedies differ between full...

More like this

Supreme Court on Illegal Arrests and Re-Arrest Rights | The Legal Observer

Supreme Court rulings in Prabir Purkayastha, Pankaj Bansal, and Vihaan Kumar cases clarify that...

Supreme Court Questions Centre on Tribunal Act | The Legal Observer

Supreme Court asks if Parliament can reintroduce provisions earlier struck down in the Tribunal...

Transfer of Title Exempts from Service Tax | The Legal Observer

The Supreme Court rules that mere transfer of title in immovable property is not...