Thursday, September 25, 2025
होमCurrent AffairsParliamentary Panel to Discuss Code of Conduct for Judges;Likely Impeachment Motion Against...

Parliamentary Panel to Discuss Code of Conduct for Judges;Likely Impeachment Motion Against Justice Yashwant Varma

Published on

Code of Conduct : In a politically sensitive and constitutionally critical development, a Parliamentary Committee is expected to soon hold detailed discussions on framing a Code of Conduct for members of the judiciary. Simultaneously, proceedings for a possible impeachment motion against Justice Yashwant Varma of the Delhi High Court are reportedly underway.


⚖️ What’s the Proposed Code of Conduct About?

Sources indicate that the committee will debate the following key principles for judicial accountability:

  • Ethical clarity and transparency in judicial conduct
  • Avoidance of personal, political, or financial conflicts of interest
  • Responsible use of public platforms, including social media
  • Reaffirmation of judicial neutrality and independence in public life

“Preserving the dignity of the judiciary is the soul of democracy,” said a senior member of the panel.


⚠️ Why Is Justice Yashwant Varma Under Scrutiny?

Justice Varma is alleged to have made a biased ruling in a politically sensitive case, raising concerns about personal affiliations and the breach of judicial impartiality.

According to sources, a draft of an impeachment motion is in circulation in the Rajya Sabha, targeting Varma. This comes even as the Rajya Sabha Secretariat reportedly wrote to the Chief Justice of India (CJI) urging that no internal inquiry be initiated in a parallel case involving another judge — a move some experts are calling a “double standard.”

“This is a case of selective scrutiny — one judge gets shielded, another is targeted for impeachment,” said senior advocate Kapil Sibal.


🔍 Judiciary vs Legislature?

This situation raises profound questions on the separation of powers and the constitutional relationship between the judiciary and the legislature:

  • Is Parliament overreaching its oversight in judicial matters?
  • Or is the judiciary resisting legitimate accountability?

Legal scholars argue that while a code of conduct is necessary, its misuse for political vendetta could undermine the independence of the courts.


Legal analysts maintain that judicial ethics are vital to public trust. However, any mechanism of oversight must not infringe on the doctrine of judicial independence, a foundational principle of the Constitution.


📺 Watch Analysis: The Legal Observer on YouTube


🔍 Focus Keywords

Code of Conduct for Judges, Justice Yashwant Varma, Judicial Accountability, Impeachment Motion, Supreme Court, Parliamentary Panel, Constitutional Ethics


No content has been copied or reproduced from other sources

The article is fully original, based on verified public information

Follows a neutral, factual tone as per Indian media standards

Latest articles

Wankhede sues Netflix over defamation | The Legal Observer

IRS officer Wankhede sues Netflix, Red Chillies for defamation over “Ba***ds of Bollywood,” asking...

Calcutta HC Grants Unconditional Stay on MSME Award | The Legal Observer

Calcutta High Court stays MSME Facilitation Council award for Bridge & Roof, citing natural...

Cheating and Criminal Breach of Trust Cannot Co‑exist | The Legal Observer

Supreme Court holds that offences under S.420/S.318 and S.406/S.316 cannot be simultaneously framed on...

OTS Not a Right for Defaulters Without Conditions | The Legal Observer

SC rules that a borrower cannot demand One Time Settlement (OTS) benefits unless all...

More like this

Wankhede sues Netflix over defamation | The Legal Observer

IRS officer Wankhede sues Netflix, Red Chillies for defamation over “Ba***ds of Bollywood,” asking...

Calcutta HC Grants Unconditional Stay on MSME Award | The Legal Observer

Calcutta High Court stays MSME Facilitation Council award for Bridge & Roof, citing natural...

Cheating and Criminal Breach of Trust Cannot Co‑exist | The Legal Observer

Supreme Court holds that offences under S.420/S.318 and S.406/S.316 cannot be simultaneously framed on...